Inverted-F (IFA) Antenna Calculator
Compact PCB antenna, good for 2.4GHz. Low profile, omnidirectional.
Suitable frequency bands on file for this style: 2.4GHz, 915MHz, 868MHz. Reported gain range: -2 to 2 dBi.
Open the Calculator
Run this exact model with your own dimensions, chip, and substrate — free, in your browser.
Open the calculator →What it does
Draws a same-layer printed inverted-F: the radiator sits beside the ground plane rather than over it. This is a counterpoise-class style — return current relies on an adequately sized ground plane, the same dependency a monopole has.
How the model works
The IFA engine computes geometry from the target frequency and box dimensions; feed-tap position sets an estimated impedance rather than a measured one. Feed impedance ≈50 Ω is a reference-anchored starting estimate for the drawn feed-tap position (TI DN0007 class layout, measured < −15 dB at 2.4 GHz), not a guarantee — analytical geometry alone cannot set the tap impedance. Include matching pads; verify and tune the tap on first-article hardware with a VNA. There is no `?application=
Limitations
Provide an unpopulated π-pad (shunt – series – shunt) footprint on the feed line at the antenna terminal, with the shunt pads referenced to the ground plane. Fit 0 Ω / DNP at build and tune on first-article hardware. Component values for that pad: Not calculated by this analytical model — populate from VNA measurement. Substrate influence on this antenna is disclosed, not modeled. This engine draws a same-layer printed inverted-F — the radiator sits beside the ground plane, not over it — and its reference anchor states the consequence directly: "Since there is no ground plane beneath the antenna, PCB thickness will have little effect on the performance." (TI DN0007 / SWRU120B §3.1.) General finite-ground feed behavior: Finite-ground detuning of the feed impedance: not calculated by this analytical model (feed model assumes a counterpoise ≥ λ0/4).
Frequently asked questions
Is the IFA feed impedance measured for my design?
No. Feed impedance ≈50 Ω is a reference-anchored starting estimate for the drawn feed-tap position (TI DN0007 class layout, measured < −15 dB at 2.4 GHz), not a guarantee — analytical geometry alone cannot set the tap impedance. Include matching pads; verify and tune the tap on first-article hardware with a VNA.
Do I need a matching pad?
Provide an unpopulated π-pad (shunt – series – shunt) footprint on the feed line at the antenna terminal, with the shunt pads referenced to the ground plane. Fit 0 Ω / DNP at build and tune on first-article hardware.
What component values go on the matching pad?
Not calculated by this analytical model — populate from VNA measurement.
Does PCB thickness matter for this style?
Substrate influence on this antenna is disclosed, not modeled. This engine draws a same-layer printed inverted-F — the radiator sits beside the ground plane, not over it — and its reference anchor states the consequence directly: "Since there is no ground plane beneath the antenna, PCB thickness will have little effect on the performance." (TI DN0007 / SWRU120B §3.1.)
What gain range is reported for IFA?
-2 to 2 dBi, suitable for 2.4GHz, 915MHz, 868MHz.
Other antenna calculators
Landed on the wrong application or antenna type? These use the same synthesis engine.